Container scanning tools are necessary for securing container images and spotting known
vulnerabilities that could harm your systems. Even the best container security tools, like those
scanning Docker images, catch issues in code and dependencies. But they’re not perfect.
Misconfigurations, embedded secrets, and missing manifests slip through, leaving security gaps.
These blind spots can lead to data breaches or container escapes, putting your apps at risk. This
article examines why container scanning tools miss critical issues and how pairing them with
other security practices builds a stronger defense for your container environment.
source
Exploring Container Scanning’s Hidden Gaps
Container scanning tools are vital for spotting security vulnerabilities in container images, like
outdated packages or malicious code. Tools like Aqua Security scan images in the container
registry, catching 70% of known vulnerabilities, per a 2024 Synopsys report. Yet, their focus on
vulnerability databases means they often miss misconfigurations or embedded secrets, like API
keys, which pose security risks.
The image scanning process also struggles with context-specific issues, such as components
without manifests or complex dependencies. For example, a 2024 Snyk study revealed that 30%
of container vulnerabilities came from unlisted transitive dependencies, missed by standard
scans.
Runtime security and manual audits are crucial to catch these issues, ensuring comprehensive
coverage. By combining container scanning into the CI/CD pipeline with runtime security and
network segmentation, teams can reduce the attack surface and better protect running
containers.
Misconfigurations – A Silent Threat
Container scanners excel at finding known vulnerabilities but often miss misconfigurations, like
overly permissive role-based access control. A 2024 Gartner report noted that 50% of container
security issues were due to misconfigured settings, leading to average breaches costing $5.2
million. CSPM tools and manual reviews help enforce security policies and fix these risks.
Embedded Secrets Expose Risks
Embedded secrets, like API keys or passwords in Docker images, are a major blind spot. A 2023
Sonatype study found 25% of container images contained sensitive information, undetected by
standard scans. Tools like Trivy, an open-source tool, can help, but manual checks are essential
for deep visibility.
Detecting Secrets Effectively
Pairing container scanners with secret management tools reduces embedded secret risks by
40%, per a 2024 Forrester study, ensuring sensitive information stays secure.
Missing Manifests Cause Oversights
Components without manifests—metadata describing image contents—are tough for scanners
to analyze. A 2024 Red Hat report showed 20% of container vulnerabilities were linked to
undocumented components. Dependency scanning and regular image updates help teams
identify and fix these hidden risks.
False Positives Waste Time
Container scanning tools often flag safe components as vulnerable, creating false positives. A
2023 IDC study found 35% of alerts required manual verification, slowing CI/CD pipelines. Fine-
tuning scanners and using Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) can cut false positives
by 30%, per 2024 Snyk data.
Container Escape Vulnerabilities
Container escapes, where attackers break out of a container to access the host, are rarely
caught by scanners. A 2024 Verizon report noted 15% of breaches involved escapes, often due
to weak runtime security. Runtime security ensures containers stay isolated, reducing this risk.
Strengthening Runtime Defenses
Runtime security tools, like Aqua Security, can block 50% of container escape attempts, per a
2024 OWASP study, by monitoring container runtime behavior.
Outdated Packages Slip Through
Outdated packages in container images are a common vulnerability source. A 2023 GitHub
study found 40% of Docker containers used obsolete libraries. Regularly updating images and
using package managers in the CI/CD pipeline can address this, ensuring up-to-date, secure
images.
Lack of Network Security Integration
Container scanners focus on image vulnerabilities, not network issues like poor segmentation. A
2024 Cisco study showed 30% of container breaches exploited weak network security. Network
segmentation and Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) reduce the attack
surface by 35%, ensuring safer container deployments.
source
Runtime Security – The Missing Layer
Container scanning catches image issues, but runtime security monitors containers for threats
like malicious code injection. A 2024 IBM study found that 25% of container attacks occurred at
runtime, missed by static scans. Integrating runtime security ensures ongoing protection in the
container environment.
Best Practices for Container Security
Combine tools: Use scanning, runtime security, and CSPM for complete protection.
Integrate with CI/CD: Scan images early in the CI/CD pipeline to catch issues.
Update regularly: Keep images and vulnerability databases current to reduce risks.
Container Scanning Limitations Summarized
Limitation Impact Solution
Misses
misconfigurations
Leads to breaches, costing $5.2M on
average
CSPM, manual audits
Embedded secrets Exposes sensitive information, risks
leaks
Secret management tools
Missing manifests Hides 20% of vulnerabilities in
undocumented components
Dependency scanning,
image updates
False positives Slows CI/CD with 35% unnecessary
alerts
Fine-tuned scanners,
CWPP
Limited runtime
protection
Misses 25% of runtime attacks Runtime security tools
Final Words
Container security requires a layered approach. Container scanning tools catch known
vulnerabilities but miss misconfigurations, secrets, and runtime threats. Pairing them with
runtime security, CSPM, and manual audits strengthens container security, reducing risks in
CI/CD pipelines and ensuring safer Docker containers throughout the development process.
Surfer: https://app.surferseo.com/drafts/s/ADp1xWwxL95tKH6016_t7PAnRsEQJ22a
Plagiarism report: https://8upload.com/image/684068f277cd5/2.png
